Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | JohnnyHerz's commentslogin

I regret that Tesla doesn't make trucks, so i can replace my fleet with Tesla's; I'd buy 120 of them tomorrow if they made one.


Well the long range cybertruck is 62k after tax rebate, which is almost palatable and arguably better than the cheapest F150 EV's, although the looks still might cause strife where strife is not needed.


And you still have to deal with all of the quality control issues that have been plaguing the Cybertruck.


I'm not sure they Cybertruck has suffered more quality issues than any other new car and platform. The big issue for me is if I got one, it would instantly be the most noticeable vehicle in the parking lot, and possibly the most expensive. I could afford the long range version, and in many ways it is a great deal, but I can't have a more noticeable car than the CEO or CTO lol. I assume you would have the same issue if you're buying cybertrucks as fleet vehicles, where people start accusing the ceo of wasting money, even if they're technically cheaper than a comparable EV pickup


> but I can't have a more noticeable car than the CEO or CTO lol

What kind of crazy company do you work for where this is something to worry about, at all?

Also no, I don't believe most new car platforms have problems with large metal bits coming off as you drive, at frequency high enough to cause a recall.


While there is certainly a lot of crap out there for business books, especially on sales/marketing and management, there are some core books that are must reads if you want to save 30 years of trial and error.

1. E-myth Revisited (absolute must read for small to midsize business owners) 2. Competitive Strategy 3. Discipline of Market Leaders 4. Good to Great 5. Built to Last


I disagree on "Good to Great" and "Built to Last". In hindsight, they're classic extrapolations of survivorship-bias in a specific era of business instead of durable business practices. It should be more accurately titled as "Built to Fail" considering how those profiled companies have faltered or floundered.

I highly recommend Buffett's letters to shareholders https://a.co/d/cc1ufM4 and Goldratt's "The Goal" https://a.co/d/iJjTf1y and Taleb's "Antifragile" https://a.co/d/4bjC74J . Aside from his mathematical treatment's of uncertainty (which are free), I wouldn't recommend any of Teleb's other books.

"Let My People Go Surfing" https://a.co/d/2hq7ngp doesn't work for all business, but I really found it personally inspirational.


If you like anti-fragile, I really recommend Fooled by Randomness and Black Swan. The Black Swan is a good example of a book with a good original idea that gets repeated so often its almost conventional wisdom, except that half the people saying it are misusing the term because they didn’t read the book.


I've read both of them and also the Bed of Procrustes. Though they're useful, I just feel the others are very classic "paper non-usefully expanded to book form" business titles whereas Antifragile's topic is benefited by the full treatise treatment.


> except that half the people saying it are misusing the term because they didn’t read the book

Oh, man, make that 95% and you would be describing The Innovator Dilemma.

What is up with people that take those ideas they never bothered to read and insist they know them?


Black Swan is one of those books that has definitely stuck with me even though it's been ~15 years since I read it.

But I would consider it philosophy, not a "business book".


For me:

- the goal

- 5 dysfunctions of a team

- the first 90 days

A friend swears by:

- atomic habits

- seven habits of highly effective people

(Slightly different genre but quite close)


Oooooh! I forgot about Atomic Habits. It's not only one of the best "business books" I've ever read. It's the single best "self-help" book I've ever read.

I disagree on "Seven Habits" as its model of "effectiveness" is only applicable to (for lack of a better term) extroverted vocations.


Tried to read antifragile but his writing came off as too egotistic for me to take seriously at the time


I also came to mention E-myth Revisited since its goal is to dissuade rather than promote. Same vibe as https://sive.rs/a


The E-myth is good. It convinced me I do not want to run a business.


Good to great and built to last are just classic survivorship bias in book form. They are interesting as history books but not as actual analysis. They are fun reads but not to be taken seriously


This is a political story about govermental issues and initiates a back and forth discussion between liberal and conservative idealogies.

Definitely NOT a technology topic.

should be flagged.



Nothing in your post has anything to do with the fundamentals of Tesla's business. You are just echoing the anti-elon propoganda. The anti-Elon movement is a moment in time that will not affect the longterm viability of Tesla's business model.

Like it or not, Tesla as a company is still years ahead of other US competitors and has a significant competitive advantage in the marketplace.

Tesla is not "in bad shape" relative to the competition. IF you are going to talk about auto companies in "bad shape", Tesla doesn't even make the top 10


Do you own Tesla stock?


Nope. No Tesla Stock_ Not an Elon Fanboy_ Not a Trumper

just can't stomache ignorance


And you're sure you're not one of Elon's alts? He so loves his alts.


If Tesla fundamentals are so good, why not?


i refuse read the biased news from CNN or FOX or MSNBC

However, I've read countless Bloomberg articles on Tesla, and the company has significant competitive advantage over every automaker (Including BYD) when it comes to manufacturing and selling EV's in the US and elsewhere.

If you are inclined to drive an EV, or own stock in an EV company, Tesla is still the gold standard.


It's like the gold standard in that it's something that used to be a big deal in the past.


BYD has overtaken Tesla technically but isn't allowed in the US due to anti-competitive, pseudo-nativist protectionism (and also a lack of homologation which doesn't make financial sense because of the previous point.)


"homologation" ...thanks for teaching me a new word that nobody would understand if i ever used it.

“Don't use a five-dollar word when a fifty-cent word will do.” ― Mark Twain


California farming is a major resource for US food and should be protected as a national security issue. Why haven't previous administrations implemented this apparently simple fix?


They were gonna cover aqueducts with solar panels. Win-win.

Now I guess they'll cover them with asbestos ?


Other sources have pointed out that this will not help agriculture at this time, and just throws away water which might be sorely needed later in the year. In addition, the way it was performed risked damaging the downstream water-distribution infrastructure.

At best, this is just another example of the sort of nonsense we can expect from an administration which will not speak sense to power, but it could also be seen as a thinly-veiled threat to California and all other states dependent on resources controlled by the federal government.


Yes, where else will we get cheap nuts and alfalfa.


for export! ffs


If it does i'll be using it


Use yt-dlp instead


(Don't take what follows as a judgement of your product. i haven't tried it and it may be amazing!)

What you are struggling with is simply a fact of life for any entrepreneur.

Get an idea, work on it, launch and discover if there is a market fit. IF no, move to next idea, start process over. Almost every great business has examples of pivoting from the original product or service and trying other ideas until landing on the one that hits.

You've built a tool. call it a your "prototype". first test case is you. do you like using it? does it truly make your life easier and more productive? IF your answer is meh, then put it aside and move on to other things.

It's depressing to leave an idea for dead. It's your baby and you love it, but it may just not be that idea's time, you may be able to come back to it at a later date with new eyes and find a way. Regardless, the journey of building something is of value to you - you can't help but learn from the experience and apply those lessons to the next endeavor.

Also, I'll state the obvious here... Building a tool for the market and building a company to sell it are two very VERY different things.

The fact that you hit the wall when it came time to take your product to market might be an indicator for you. Maybe your are Woz and you just need to find your Steve.

If this try is a failure, continue to believe in yourself and never give up.

So many successful entrepreneurs are serial failures, until they aren't.


"The Real Anthony Fauci" is absolutely damning.

Fauci has stated that RFK's book is full of lies. If that was true, then why has Fauci not sued RFK for libel?

"Methinks he doth protest too much"


I find it interesting that Michael Bloomberg penned an oped this morning in which he warns against RFK JR's potential influence in govt, using RFK's stance against fluoride in our water as one of his attack points.

Yet here we have WAPO - another bastion of liberal thought media - taking what virtually amounts to an opposing stance to Bloomberg while providing tacit support for RFK.

looks like the billionaire media moguls aren't quite on the same page. They might want to check their jersey color to see if they are still on the same team.


The opinion article was written by a contributing columnist and is not necessarily the opinion of the newspaper.

Not all liberals are opposed to fluoride; it's one of those things where the public health establishment has an immune response to people who want to get rid of it, even though there seems to be plenty of data suggesting that water fluoridation does have some risks (mostly cosmetic) and is probably not as healthy/necessary as the establishment says.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: