Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | MisterMower's commentslogin

If his point is that unserious you could just, you know, refute it.

I already did, 2 comments above.

And that benefits them… how?

Not sure, but any event, positive or negative, will benefit those who know the exact timing in advance.

Related, the longer you wait to do it, the faster they seem to catch on. We waited until each of our kids’ third birthday to potty train and knocked it out in a weekend, no major subsequent accidents.

A lot of parents will tell you they’ve potty trained their kids and also tell you their two-year-old wets the bed evey other week.


What is a diaper service?


They can totally make it work, it’s just currently cheaper to have humans do it.

Solving the technical challenges and using that solution profitably are two completely different things.


How would the spot price go to zero? Wouldn’t it be infinity? Demand is not zero, supply is zero?


Spot price is the price of a futures contract, not the actual silver. If the exchange can't deliver, what good is a contract? It would be worthless.


Just because the gold standard had flaws doesn’t mean the fiat system that replaced it is flawless or even better. There are tradeoffs involved in both systems.

In a fiat currency system there is no meaningful constraint on the supply of money. We’re experiencing the effects of that feature of the fiat system currently. Tying the supply of money to a rare commodity like gold may create other problems, but it completely solves the issue of currency devaluation.

For the record, the world was on the gold standard when the agricultural and industrial revolutions occurred. It’s not at all obvious to me that the gold standard prevents productivity growth.


The trade off equation has been: some inflation, in return for much larger economic growth & fewer less devastating crashes. Seems to have been a good trade so far.




Kids these days have no clue what a real bear market looks like. They were barely in grade school during the 2008 crash.


The validity of state violence in the minds of a lot of rural people went through a phase change after Covid.

The folks I know who were previously sympathetic the constraints on government overreach watched state and federal governments impose policies that made no sense for their communities and were actively detrimental to their livelihoods and enforce those policies with fines and even jail time in some instances.

These people would have been against the tactics ICE is using in 2019. Today they’re ambivalent. The attitude is “what comes around goes around.”


Good for South America? Or good for the USA?


Yes.

To phrase it more completely, regime change and general destabilization of Latin American countries has definitely led to the immigration crisis in the United States now. Lack of stable governments and economies has absolutely exacerbated the production and transportation of drugs into the United States. Hundreds of thousands of Latin Americans have been killed or disappeared by US-empowered gangs or governments.

Now that said, I don't know what the world would look like had their right to self-determination been preserved. Nobody knows. But as a general rule, countries whose power structures were not toyed with by colonial powers do better than countries whose power structures were toyed with.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: