My git pre-commits are usually calling other executables or other tools, so I'm not quite sure how much it matters how fast is the git pre-commit tool. Can we have a benchmark of a normal use case of how much time are we saving with this new tool?
Being written in rust instead of python or go probably doesn't matter that much. But being able to run multiple tasks in parallel, which hk claims to do, could make a big difference.
I'm actually planning to buy one too.
I agree with most of the comments about 120Hz refresh,
But I disagree about 4k (not enough content) and this is more personal my last monitor was 32" and it was a huge pain to travel with and I don't have a mansion to be far away from the monitor... so I think I'm aiming this time for 24".
Yeah it is basically just for jobs in the US right now. You technically can apply from elsewhere, but you should specify your location correctly and make sure to set the right answers for the vis/sponsorship questions when signing up.
Nope, sorry... almost no one cared about that "scandal" except a few uptight incels who fucked off to make a fork that also no one cares about, and which is now dead. Godot is doing just fine without them.
Great question! We are a team of two: Viktor handles design, and I take care of engineering. Using Supabase allows us to focus on features rather than backend infrastructure. We found Supabase to be perfectly aligned with our needs, and it's open-source! Plus, it uses Postgres, which we love.
or is this "Yet Another Rust Rewrite" (YARR)?