Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Something1234's commentslogin

I tried it tonight, and it's installation is frustrating to say the least.

For me `openclaw init` did not work, and I've tried installing twice, and still running into issues. Also it took fairly beefy vps on my home server at 4GB of ram, so not sure how I feel about it.


What’s the graphic novel?

I don't know. I'll ask her. She burns thru them and it may have already been returned to the library.

I was conflating. She said another kid at school (who has a self-taught programming background) talked about running DOOM on the microbit devices they started programming at school. She didn't follow the reference. (The graphic novel inquiry was an unrelated bit of cultural idiom.)

Some developers like ligature based fonts. They combine 2 characters into one glyph

Thank you and the others who were kind enough to explain this. I've avoided such fonts like the plague. Didn't know it did arrows like that.

Is it so complicated to proxy the request through your first party site? Vite easily lets you do it


Some sites are backend-less


What about Aperture Labs Desk Job as a demo for the deck? Full self contained single player story.


While it was more a tech demo than a full game, this one was a great game anyway.


It would be completely centralized with a micropayment rent seeking solution to update records.


I think it would actually be (pseudo-)decentralized and you'd have to mine a blockchain node containing each domain, where its creators will have reserved at least 10% of its node pool to make sure they became billionaires if it took off.

Plus micropayments, of course :-)


Nono, it would run decentralized in blockchain with a mircropayment rent seeking solution to update records.


You’re right that it would run on a block chain, but that fact would primarily exist to power some marketing. Everybody would end up interacting with it through a single centralized web site and API because it’s the only usable way to get it to work.


{txid:"7abde7838e8db8ba98bf8b74be77a9e787be7b8bfb7b893", gas: 0.00015, query: "A", domain: "blabla.com", actual-dns-that-will-resolve-the-query: "8.8.8.8"}


I laughed at first, then I cried, because sadly, it's true.


Expand your definition of warfare.


To something that isn’t actually warfare? I don’t understand the exercise.


What would be the next better feature for a plug? It seems USB-C has it all except for being expensive on the port side with the muxers. Anything different would require tossing a bunch of still useful things. It supports fast charging and good data rates.


That's the entire problem though, isn't it? Now we'll never know.

The one thing I can think of off the top of my head is some sort of magnetic connection similar to macbook chargers to prevent damage when the cord gets pulled out. (Also I would like the USB-3 standard to not suck, but that's never happening and doesn't relate to the physical hardware anyways)


> That's the entire problem though, isn't it? Now we'll never know.

There are definitely a lot of harmful regulation, but this one is amazing with close to no downsides. For one, there are magnetic adapters for everything nowadays, including USB-C ports so you can have your cake and eat it too. Second is the environmental impact of the old charger ecosystem. I lost count of how many cables and chargers I have that are now trash^1. Third one is that historically standardizing interfaces was great for innovation.

^1: Here is the various USB e-waste that I have - usb micro C (2 separate types with same name), micro usb super speed (this one is particularly cursed), mini-usb types A and B, and normal USB type A and type B.


> Here is the various USB e-waste that I have - usb micro C (2 separate types with same name), micro usb super speed (this one is particularly cursed), mini-usb types A and B, and normal USB type A and type B.

Catch just two more and you can challenge the USB trainer in Viridian City!


The protocol was flawed in its design in that it does not standardize or communicate the capabilities of the cable. How do I know whether it’s charging only, data, or thunderbolt? No standard way to understand this


MagSafe?


I saw cuneiform tablets over at the Penn Museum. The text was a lot tighter than what is on these tablets. Still a really neat concept, and it's neat that you can actually read it.

Tbh really curious if these will date to our era and confuse a lot of archaeologists later.


I saw a tweet that said, "2000 years from now nobody will know the difference between a booty call and a butt dial, and this is why the Bible is hard for us to understand." So yes, this very well could confuse archeologists in the future and I'm here for it!


That lines up with the far-future RPG 'Diana: Warrior Princess', set in the ancient 20th century as described by myth. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_L._Rowland#Diana:_Warri... Her legend is beyond the power of one bard to sing.


If you were at the Penn Museum, you were looking at tablets mostly written in Akkadian and Sumerian cuneiform. Those languages are written in a mostly syllabic cuneiform system. These tablets are English written in the Old Persian cuneiform alphabet. The Old Persian alphabet, being an alphabet, has a smaller number of simpler signs than you'd see in Akkadian and Sumerian, which require hundreds of different signs that are generally more elaborate.


I think it’s an outtake from the “You suck at excel talk” by Joel Spoelsky


I can't find where I thought I read this. I'm assuming I must have seen a transcript of this speech, once? Regardless, I'm fairly confident this is what I was remembering. Thanks!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: