Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | TheresNoTime's commentslogin

Nice!


Great points! In an ideal world, editors would note exactly where in the referenced work they found the information — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Ident... has some guidance on how to do that :)


I mean, there is even stuff like linking to pages in PDF files... but I feel like it's another feature that's rarely used.

Maybe, in an ideal world, I could imagine an editing experience with a split screen editor with the article text and the references open at the same time. Right now, it does feel like references are an afterthought in the editing workflow.


Maybe I need to add a section (in bold, flashing red text?) reiterating that you need to read the citations and not rely on the content?

This recent example is awful, yes, but relied heavily on a Wikipedia project which has less strict referencing rules, and was consumed by people who didn't take the time to fact-check — we're about on par with Encyclopedia Britannica (ref: https://www.nature.com/articles/438900a)


As always, excited to see what CF have been working on :)




Well that's the first time that's happened to me in a while. This round, good sir, is yours.


Okay, now where's Bad Apple?

EDIT oh it's here, i hadn't scrolled down far enough: https://twitter.com/Legonzaur/status/1487018326601748483


You're going to hell.


oh you evil man


Nope?


The ratio of "but Web3 good lol" comments to those actually appreciating a well made site giving a playful jab at silly net fads is a bit low eh..


it's nicely made, no?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: