Unless I'm misreading this, I would also offer `mosh` as a recommendation. Has been nothing but excellent for my use cases.

zmosh is zmx+mosh

https://github.com/mmonad/zmosh

Have you considered https://authenticator.cc/ ?

I realize it is amusing to even consider offloading OTP generation to a web browser extension however, if `$work` doesn’t want to provide you with the correct hardware (e.g. Yubikey, NitroKey, etc.) there are boundary-respecting alternatives

I just got a little more excited ;)

What a fun little website!

Every time I stumble onto it I have to resist not buying five gimmicky things.

My favorite is the Short Sided Ruler.

Perfect for April 1st.

I'd honestly love to know what framework, theme, or stack is being used here! Looks incredible--great job!

Hi! I am the developer of Retr0's portfolio. I used nextjs for the framework, with framer motion + gsap for animation. The blog is powered by hashnode headless api with serverside rendering.

Awesome! Thank you for the follow up and great work!

Am I missing something here or is inference going to be painful given the "low" memory bandwidth compared to, say, HBM2E?

273GB/sec with good FP4 performance should be fine for developers playing with inference. This isn't the kind of thing that you'd use for inference workloads supporting millions of users.

I'd like to see a inference benchmark vs the strix halo, which has better memory bandwidth and costs 2/3rds as much.

I guess since these devices aren't meant for production throughput, but rather about having enough RAM for local experimentation with large enough models, it's an ok tradeoff at this price point...

Have you seen anything with 128GB of HBM2E at anywhere near the DGX Spark's $3,000 price point?

The AMD Radeon VII has 16GB HBM2 and sold for $700 in 2019. I don't know how that would translate to today's HBM2E's pricing like if its price change follows that of GDDR's.

I honestly can't say I have however, that doesn't mean it couldn't physically exist/happen? Perhaps a "little" more cost but I'd be willing to bet people would gladly pay the premium for such a device. I'm also very curious to know what the BOM for an A100 actually is as well as HBM2E per GB.

Wait. Doesn’t this mean you’re just giving PFAS to the blood recipient?

Yes, but their blood/plasma PFA concentration won't change at all unless your blood has extremely high PFA concentrations.

Even if it did, the average blood/plasma recipient is more concerned about "not dying of blood loss" than PFAs.

Not necessarily. I visit our local medical vampire every 3 months to drain a pint due to high levels of ferritin (hemochromatosis issues). I asked what they do with the blood. They destroy it by ashing it. The tech said they do this with any blood drawn from someone with a known disease state. So if phlebotomy becomes a common treatment for PFAS loads, I'd guess the draws would be destroyed. I hope.

He/she has probably lost some PFAS recently, if in need of a transfusion.

As a user going on 5+ years now I just wanted to say thanks! Reassuring to hear the team is passionate about what they’re building.

What was the tool used to generate this output?

That looks like whois, available on most Unix versions.

I literally setup an alias last week in O365 Outlook using the pattern a.b@c.com? I’ve been able to receive and send using the alias as well. Maybe this is a new feature/behavior?

I may have misunderstood the parent comment - with gmail, you can add dots anywhere in the mailbox and it all goes to the same place (standard gmail, not workspace)

e.g andrew@gmail.com, a.n.d.r.e.w@gmail.com and a.....ndrew@gmail.com all are the same user and will go into their mailbox (which I have used to avoid the + stripping that some sites do)

andrew@outlook.com and a.ndrew@outlook.com are two distinct users.

Obviously if you control the domain or use a provider who supports it you can add an alias with punctuation but then you might as well just use e.g ebay@c.com to track the email source.