Open corruption is not like Open Source, where you can see everything, it just adds to the non-obvious publicly hidden corruption.

It makes it more accepted, because if everyone is doing it why wouldn't I do it?

I would only host worthless stuff there

The problem I encounter more frequently is: Advertised number is high %, then after considering all risks and terms and conditions it is sub average.

In principle I like it, what I don't like is that some companies will use the data only for their own benefit / dystopian nightmare mission.

Another comment here claims their license forbids that.

Interesting, is there something like this for azure

I was initially inspired by the https://instances.vantage.sh/, so, like them, I want to add other providers later. Like Azure and GCP.

It would also be interesting to have cross-provider comparison. I think it's doable. Thanks!

I think the more stressful part is the management expectation that things will speed up more, especially when you can generate plausible looking frontends relatively quickly. And if you have out of touch control-freak management without any technical experience, you waste more life time arguing with them.

Of course you also might exhaust yourself to some degree, as your own expectation might be that you can develop multiple things in parallel, while also having to review a lot of code where you might not have context, so in a way you have to hold more high level context in your brain state, what might be somewhat stressful. However, when you have been tech lead once, all of that is somewhat familiar.

For marketing purposes it is always too dangerous, not saying it is safe

Interesting that there is consumer protection in US. But aren't dark patterns like everywhere?

Spreadsheets.