Given the state of webdev it is not a surprise. LLMs are my rubber gloves when working with web technologies.

How is to compare to AdGuard? If it gets those features I would be switching over.

Numa can do recursive resolution from root nameservers + DNSSEC, .numa local domains with auto HTTPS for dev, and LAN service discovery. What features would you be interested in?

What about split horizon dns so I can locally resolve home servers instead of going to tailscale

Split DNS already works — Numa auto-detects Tailscale forwarding rules from the system config. Queries matching .<ts.net> go to Tailscale’s DNS, everything else goes through Numa

If you want to skip Tailscale entirely for home servers, Numa’s LAN discovery auto-finds machines running Numa on the same network. Or add static records in numa.toml for machines that don’t run it.

I miss working on Power platforms. It is such a nice system with openfirmware. The world went another way.

OP didn't say about confusing Opus with Qwen but rather people being confused about Qwen3.6-Plus not being available as an "open weight" model available for self hosting.

> Please make sure you have a Mac with more than 32GB of unified memory. Time for an upgrade I guess. If I can run Qwen3.5 locally than it is time to switch over to local first LLM usage.

How could they achieve this with much abstraction?

Ohh no, so they caught up with US border patrol?

Did we democratise software engineering? Seriously, I created a bunch of tools that I find useful without the bloated framework issues that are present in software nowadays. Jokes on me if something does not work.

Software production yes engineering no lol

exactly

Highly Expressive Macros

No thanks. Most of the time you do not need macros and adding those is not free.

     CGP enables you to write overlapping and orphan implementations of any trait, breaking free from Rust's coherence rules while maintaining type safety.

I am not sure that I need this. I can't remember to run this issue in the last couple of years.

Isn't it the case that coherence is what makes Rust’s dependency graph sound? So, why would I want to give up that?

> Isn't it the case that coherence is what makes Rust’s dependency graph sound? So, why would I want to give up that?

Read the article that comment is on, it's all about why one would want that.

I have read it. I see only theoretical reasons not really practical ones. Maybe I do not use Rust enough to run into issues with coherent Rust.

So is the living cost. Insurance, housing, etc. A better comparison is PPP.

Living costs are similarly high in many places that have nowhere near the salaries of the US.

It's still the land of opportunities. It's easier to find ways to reduce your living costs than ways to increase your salary.