I feel dumb, but what does oxidized mean in this context?

migrate to rust.

Can jj iterate through a list of repositories and clone them all to local storage?

It isn't very hard to make a bash script to do it, but I have about six github repos, all of which frequently need to be put on a new machine. that kind of functionality would be cool to have out of the box.

    for url in url1 url2 ..; do git clone $url; done

That’s not really a script but a basic one liner.

No, but to be honest, why would you want it to? That's... well, you already showed the trivial one-liner.

Are you accessing these boxes via ssh or using them directly? If it's via ssh, I'd expect that you would already be using the clipboard for copying the names of them rather than typing them out manually, at which point copying `git clone <a> && git clone <b> && ...` would achieve the same thing.

This is all terrifying data.

Made worse that there's a significant number of people who refuse to believe it, and for all the wrong reasons at that.

Global warming doesn't exist.

If it does, it's not that bad.

If it gets bad, it's not a big deal in reality.

If it becomes a big deal, it was not humanity's fault.

And if it was humanity's fault, at least the planet was saved from a global dictatorship run by scientists.

You're missing: it's real and we did it but it's good, and, it's real and we did it and it's bad but it would cost too much to fix it now.

Seriously. And not even to build a house, but to make a single person not homeless. Give me a break.

The Clinton administration ran a budget surplus

He ran a surplus by (In Bill Clinton's own words) "ending welfare as we know it". This was his description of the Personal Responsibility Act he signed. That attack on labor and bolstering of the financial markets was a huge contributor to our economic disasters. Keynesian was never meant to be a permanent solution to a growing capitalism system. And the Hayekian system we have now is just pillaging by neoliberals.

> ending welfare as we know it

> That attack on labor

How is ending welfare an "attack on labor"?

(I live in a welfare state and am quite happy about it, despite it having very real financial consequences for me. Welfare state does not benefit "labor", but rather benefits the various people who either can't or don't want to perform labor)

Why do laborers have to work for the right to live when capitalists only have to provide capital and are always assumed to be worthy? Capital and labor is combined to produce new capital. Yet we only expect labor to prove their worth. We're always holding labor's feet to the fire and killing them through policy that allows their poverty by assuming they are lazy.

There is basically zero consequence for capitalists when they decide to withhold capital from laborers. Therefore taking away labor's ability to generate new capital. They took down the entire rust belt by doing this. Why shouldn't we hold them accountable? Why does everyone blame labor and say welfare is only for people in poverty?

> Why do laborers have to work for the right to live

I don't know why, but this is sort of the definition of a laborer, no? Someone who labors.

People who live on welfare are – by definition – not laborers. That was my whole point: "ending welfare" is not "an attack on labor", it's an attack on non-labor.

I reject your definition of welfare. You're thinking far too narrowly about the benefit to society by taking care of your citizens' needs.

What is your definition of welfare? Generally caring how the citizens are doing? I believe governments usually don't. There's too much politics for that.

Again, that's a domestic issue. It was at a time, when all US adversaries were either in trouble or not stabilized yet.

I bounced off the loading animation

I thought the site was down/broken

Is there anything we can do to make it better?

Strict regulations around prediction markets for everyone. Incentives around politics, war/killing, etc need to be tightly restricted.

This sounds super cool.

What does your dev stack look like?

I have been making web apps for years. A few year ago I converted my base stack into a scaffold that lets me spin up a full working project with API, CLI and UI.

I use NodeJS with a highly structured ExpressJS app for the API. It uses an npm module, tools-library-dot-d to implement a carefully scooped plugin structure for endpoints, data model and data mapping. It has built-in authentication and database (sqlite).

Nuxt/Vue/Vuetify/Pinia for the UI. It has a few components that implement things (like navigation) the way I like. It supports login and user editing.

The stack includes a utility that looks at a directory for executable CLI tools (usually NodeJS or BASH) and adds them to the session PATH. The API stack has boilerplate to treat CLI apps as data-model services.

Does that help?

Definitely! Thanks for the reply.