Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | gardenhedge's commentslogin

Your company is missing an architect role. An architect would know why redis over in-memory cache and have that pattern documented. They would definitely know why graphql for the one service but REST everywhere else - they would have it documented from design approval meetings.

Do people discuss detail on Teams in your company? In my place it turns into calls..

Teams calls. I let Teams transcribe it and parse the transcription via AI.

Isn't this a drop in the ocean? Why would any 'normal' person forgo flying? How much CO2 emissions have 'world leaders' produced going to summits, or Taylor Swift and her fans flaying to concerts or war flights?

Couple of things: 1) NO ONE is suggesting any one forego flying altogether, or skipping their once-a-year overseas vacation or periodic family visit. 2) THIS level of flying is not normal and is exactly the kind of harmful behavior people have in mind when they complain about frequent flyers. 3) Whinging about summits and Taylor Swift is just a bad faith red herring argument. Obviously less flying is better, no matter by who. To the extent it's related to the topic at all, it bolsters the case for less air travel.

28 flights per year.

That's 14 round trip flights. A little over once a month. Not at all surprising if once a month. Or divorced and kid is in another state.

If we're generous and assume each trip is actually 2 flights (i.e. connecting flights), then it's 7 per year.

Yeah, more than typical. But not insane.


For this particular person, the inordinate factor is not the frequency of flights, but the distance: 40 flights in 2019, mostly from the US to Austria via Frankfurt. Now, there are some jobs that really do require such travel (though the business should probably consider hiring locally even though it might be more expensive?), but probably fairly few. The individual doesn't show flying stats after 2021, but presumably the work did get done even in the pandemic years when they couldn't fly as often.

> Not at all surprising if once a month.

Typo: Should have been "Not at all surprising if for work".


I don't know why someone going on a vacation would have moral high ground over someone that HAS TO travel for his work. If you are scientist you absolutely have to fly a lot to visit lots of conferences, disseminate your work, provide lectures etc.

Understand this is both an individual and systemic critique. We have the internet. Much of the travel you describe can and should be done remotely. The top 1% of flyers account for 50% of emissions. I would argue most of that probably is unnecessary technically, but there is both a push and pull factor from people expecting some things to take place face to face.

We're adults, we can keep many things in our minds at one time: We should all reduce flying. Regular working people should not be shamed for taking a holiday and flying there. The most frequent fliers for work should make a personal effort to reduce their flying. And companies, conferences, etc. should work much harder to facilitate remote participation and reduce stigma around it, as well as encouraging other modes of travel. Governments should improve alternative solutions such as rail and high-speed rail.


Why do anything for the greater good at all then? (Also there's a big gap between "forgo flying" and "fly every 2 weeks for 7 years")

Everything any one person does is a 'drop in the ocean'. Thankfully, we organize and do things collectively very well - it's in our fundamental nature going back to non-human ancestors, and there is a long, rich history of how much we accomplish. Alsmost nothing that has ever been accomplished has been done without a lot of people doing it together.

The general concern around Taylor Swift's emissions has always struck me as shortsighted. Her Eras tour is estimated to have generated around $5bn in economic uplift in the US, at an estimated 10,000 tonnes CO2e for her personal travel. Even if the total footprint is higher, that is thousands of times lower than the emissions intensity of an industry like fast fashion. From an environmental point of view, attending a Taylor Swift show is a much less carbon-intensive way to spend your money than ordering from Temu.

People just want a scapegoat that allows them to say they have no responsibility

Bill Clinton who got caught in a sex scandal... smart?


And Noam Chomsky was deeply connected to JE and his island, which is a significantly larger scandal.

The point is that intelligence is orthogonal to, say, lust or many other trappings of power.


I didn't read any email where Chomsky was connected to JE's island


Solution 4: Break the fan. Change it into smaller boxes each with the fan name.

Service A -> Firewall -> Service X

Service C -> Firewall -> Service Z


In my company, instead of relying on an ops team.. we rely on a devops team.


If you could see analytics you would see I am the worst player at this game. But it is cool - can you actually plug in a keyboard to your laptop and use it? If so, what would HN recommend I get? As mentioned I suck at musical instruments but it could be a cool hobby to see if I can learn anything.


Hey gardenhedge,

Haha - I don't collect any telemetry so your secret is safe. Yeah - if you've got a USB midi keyboard plugged in - the game should autodetect it and just work.

If you're looking for something portable that just works (and don't need a weighted action) - IK Multimedia makes a 37-key controller that is cheap and decent. It's frequently on sale for about $80-120 and probably could be had for cheaper secondhand.

https://www.ikmultimedia.com/products/irigkeys2


I did not know going to a cafe alone was a strange thing to do. In fact it is a place I would consider it is completely common to go alone - whereas a restaurant is less common.


Cool website - but it made me just go play the lotto. Here's hoping I win a million at 2pm GMT


> Be lonely and without any kind of company and human connection my entire life

You may be lonely now, but you will have some different stages in life where friendship and companionship may appear.

First - when you start working you will join a team of some sorts. Just be yourself and and make sure you attend all the team nights out.

Second - traveling. You can join tour groups and visit some cool places. Don't do this to specifically find friends but you will be part of a group and have companionship for a brief period.

Thirdly - dating. You will be able to find a partner. This is most peoples main companion in life.

Fourthly - you could join a non-work team where you can have social interactions. I can't give too much advice on this one because I am not on a team like this.

Fifthly - find a co-founder and start a company


Nailing it all, thanks.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: