Currently you can simply add a username/password to log in with under "+ Instructions" or log in yourself and paste in a JSON exported from the Cookie-Editor browser extension under "+ Cookies".
I'll look into HTTP 402 + macaroon tokens, thanks!
About a month ago I was experimenting with giving Claude Code access to a browser. I was surprised by how good it was. AI can now both write apps and use a web browser to see if everything works. I thought this was huge. We can now digest data, write specs, implement features AND get feedback on them in a matter of minutes with AI. And I couldn't find much work being done on the last part. Why not build a product around AI UX testing?
A week later, ClankerView was born.
You enter a URL to your product and spin up 1-6 agents to review it, then watch as they get personas based on your target audience, open up a browser, click around, scroll, fill forms, and react to screenshots of what they see. They then write structured UX reviews that you can use to make improvements to your product.
You can even review behind authentication. Give the agent credentials in the instructions or skip the auth by pasting session cookies to the agent (they are deleted after the review).
I naturally tried it on all of my side projects and found plenty of useful insights, similar to what people who tried them told me.
I then tried a bunch of other products. For example, Framer's onboarding review found some useful actionable issues: the onboarding survey answers are ignored, it bothers you with the desktop app before you get to the web app, you land in a blank canvas after choosing a template, and a bunch more. The verdict was "Framer's marketing says it's for everyone. The product says it's for designers." 5/10 https://clankerview.com/share/UVCSqrBipcsxfxJh
My P14s Gen1 AMD (very similar to T14) with Debian still has this problem. 2 days unplugged will drain the whole battery and turn off. Maybe it's because I kept a Windows partition around?
I used to use Logseq with Syncthing, but I ran into a bunch of sync conflicts that were annoying to deal with and sometimes it would just stop syncing for no reason. Luckily, they've just made Logseq Sync available to all backers on OpenCollective and it works quite well. I'm very happy with the setup now. I think they're making Sync available as a paid monthly service soon.
Honestly surprised by how much support this is getting, despite the devs' absurd views on open source[1]. Why anyone would choose this instead of Logseq is beyond me.
Many reasons:
* in logseq, everything is a list. In Obsidian, prose is first class citizen as well
* The plugin API is simple and discovery of plugins is super well inregrated
* I don't like Obsidian's business model either but it's a bunch of commited indie devs actively engaging with their community and the efforts are visible. Kudos for that.
* The community of practitioners and contributors of plugins is just incredible.
Maybe some of it is true for logseq, but finding articles, tutorials, guidelines and examples for obsidian certainly contributes to it's success.
I was considering Obsidian, and your comment worried me enough to investigate.
Looking through that link, though, I don't see anything too absurd. It's a closed-source app, which isn't ideal but is common enough. It looks like they have a Github repo that explicitly does not have the core source code but hosts some secondary files, and that's spelled out in the first couple lines of the readme.
Seems fine to me, overall. Maybe there's something objectionable I missed in there?
Have you considered that your personal ethos which appears to stipulate 'views on open source' as a prime criterion for choosing software may not actually be a human universal?
There's GuidedTrack[1], which is a simple way to program complex surveys or tests, but can be used to create apps as well. It has been used to create Mind Ease[2] and UpLift[3].
There is a quick demo[4] on the site to show how it works.
Full disclosure: I'm a developer on GuidedTrack. Any feedback is appreciated.
I took the Giving What We Can Pledge[1] and donate 10% of my income to effective charities for this reason. It barely makes a difference to me and it saves more than 1 life a year. They also have a really cool How Rich Am I calculator[2] to put it in context.
I still chose to pull the lever though because I don't have $18000 in my life savings yet.
I'll look into HTTP 402 + macaroon tokens, thanks!