Just cancelled my chatgpt subscription.

That's a wrong move I guess (you willingly take pain but no one else suffers). The right one would be to get an Anthropic subscription. And an even better one would be to donate to the Democrats.

I already have an Anthropic sub.

There is not a single Democrat candidate I agree with or would gladly donate to. That party is almost as much of a joke as the Republicans are, and they all fuck kids anyways.

Besides, that money would only end up being spent on an absentee, self-obsessed, do-nothing Governor who wants to play more corrupt politics like his Aunt. Scam artists across the board.

Ah yes the paragons of virtue who dont also insidiously continue dismantling the country in their own way lol.

An even better one would be to run for office on the platform of not being a piece of shit like everyone else. Democrats aren't good.

I like the idea here, but the final product is just so far from what good interactive articles/explanations actually look like. E.g., this style of article:

- https://mlu-explain.github.io/decision-tree/

- any article from distill.pub

- any piece from NYT

Don’t you dare forget https://ciechanow.ski/

Good call, I'm sure I've left off a lot of amazing work, and his is certainly top class!

This is an absolute wealth of information about gravitational mechanics but quite a few of the diagrams were so alien to me that they became undecipherable.

There is much more than the one article. Check the archives.

It's about what I thought would be possible. I look forward to things of the calibre of redblobgames, but perhaps no this year.

That decision-tree page is killer!

And those are all auto-generated?

Of course they are not. That is the whole point.

If by "auto-generated" you mean, does the LLM generate the output from the input, then yes.

It's very bad in my experience. It hallucinates like crazy - e.g. something simple as enumerating the correct hidden dimension for a transformer-based model (same across all layers) it gets wrong often.

Why? Genuinely, who cares? Is some demographic group not caught in the 8 going to be offended by basic checkbox screen? Is someone with a niche form of colorblindness going to have difficulty navigating the UI?

How can you seriously pretend to do any study with only eight people involved? Especially when your company is worth billion. It just calls for bad press and criticism of amateurism.

I mean, yes? A very broad spectrum of people need to use the internet, and cloudflare has inserted themselves in the middle of it.

I don't necessarily find a problem with them, but its weird how they boasted about massive scale and importance of this, but then only just went with 8 tests.

That's nothing. Former/current YC founders are also abusing BookFace.

I did YC and now work at a frontier lab.

I've received multiple spam-style emails from (mostly young) current founders tagging me and all other YC-alum at my place-of-work with the profiles of their friends for internship roles, referrals, etc.. Same girl has done it for like 5 different people.

I don't get it. The author is 'honest to a fault,' but then lies about discussing the polygraph with others and posts an anonymous op-ed.

When she started the CIA described her personality as naively honest. She concludes that the way they treat honest people makes it an unwise career choice. But, a pathological fantasist might have quite a different experience and no motivation to write an op-ed.

A16z partners don't know shit. Brain dead nepo-babies - how's Cluely?

This post title is completely misleading.

From the article: the shooter's behavior triggered internal alarms, and some employees asked leadership to alert authorities, but:

| OpenAI leaders ultimately decided not to contact authorities.

The article title isn't wrong unless you assume that the title implies the employees did in fact contact authorities, but if they did it would read "Open AI raised", not "Open AI employees raised". We all know how much company leadership listens to its employees, of course.

AMZN getting a straight F: https://aureus-swart.vercel.app/stock/AMZN

AWS alone would probably be an A but you can't separate them in the cash flow statement. Take away the retail aspect and it would be a different story.

And yet, your entire post history is dismissive quips.