Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | lelaurent's commentslogin

If you’re using it for gaming, it would be preferable to leave it plugged in to avoid the danger of the battery running empty.

Why not let the users use it as they see fit?


It's still my dedicated phone.

Works quite well mostly still.

Why not yours if you don't have very high expectations?


She didn't follow your directions, they seem to have been quite clear, why is that your fault?

Part of communication is also to give feedback about such things


GP expressed the need for an umbrella and she went above and beyond. He now knows that she's the type of person who will do so, so now knows to add a disclaimer to not go out of her way. Or he can just appreciate the fact that she will go out of her way and sincerely express that appreciation.

No fault here for either party. Just a learning experience. And as you say, he can give the feedback that she didn't need to go out of her way as well.


Exactly, I write a literal message with a literal if/then meaning. She reads it as "my partner is out in the rain and would like me to help".

Of course I think _my_ communication style is "better". But the best communication style is actually the one that communicates your thoughts to the other person, not the one that "makes the most sense".

And meanwhile there are still cases where it will be the other way around and I am going "well I said X, but surely you could have read between the lines..."

So yeah, the best response is to tell her about the miscommunication so she can know better next time, but it's stupid to try and say she was "wrong". It takes two!



To me the premise "if you haven't left yet" implies "don't go out of your way" and adding that would be redundant. But not everyone sees things the same way so you have to adapt communication individually based on experience.


There's possibly a buried lede there, of the GF feeling like she cannot ask questions for clarifications or cannot let the commenter down.


Or infinite reasons:

- Rain distribution isn't uniform, it poured where she was and thought it was necessary.

And/or

- Overestimating time/sunk cost fallacy ("it's just going to take 2 minutes")

And/or

- Giving less importance to ponctuality than others

And/or

- She didn't have one and thought it was a good idea, worth being late

And/or ...


It's not about 'fault' really, it's about achieving better outcomes by learning from previous experiences.


You can archive this without tech by practicing mindfulness.

Begin by focusing on your breath whenever you leave a room.


Can’t you just use a numeric combination lock?


The locking feature built-in locks it at the hub. I feel good that I've made some thief's day worse.


How did they find it?


The best part of the article: "The Australian Defence Force has been asked to verify the recovered capsule by checking its serial number."

So they're not certain they have found it, yet.

They could have found one of the other radioactive capsules lying about the Western Australia outback.


The only mildly strange thing about it is that such a check should take like 10 seconds and this article was apparently written after the capsule was found, but before the result of the check was announced.

But the serial number check itself is an obvious thing to do and it doesn't necessarily imply they believe there are more of the capsules missing.


It's going to take a bit longer than 10 secobds to safely get close enough to such a strong radiation source as to take a clear picture or read a number.


It's not that strong of a source. You wouldn't want to go about your day with it in your pocket, but last I read a 1m exposure for an hour was a few x-rays worth of radiation. Take out your phone and zoom in.

And since they knew they were looking for radioactive material, I would hazard a guess that they already have necessary protection.


The article was updated to say the serial number was confirmed, it took about three hours after the news first broke. Seems fair, probably took that long for the Australian Defense Force to get to the capsule.


username etc


It is explained in the article.

"He said a search vehicle was driving past at 70 kilometres per hour on the Great Northern Highway when a detection device revealed radiation."


I would have loved to see their reactions when they found it.


Cut to a cargo van with Australians in radiation suits in the back.

Geiger counter clicks.

“I think that’s it.”

The end.


I'm guessing that even though tho capsule is tiny, its radiation signature could be detected from quite a distance using a Geiger counter.


    Because the output pulse from a Geiger–Müller tube is always of the same magnitude (regardless of the energy of the incident radiation), the tube cannot differentiate between radiation types.
No "signature" detection possible with simple counters I'm afraid.

They used trucks on the road with large doped sodium iodide crystal pack (tubes with a scintallation (flash) detector at the ends) that produce a second by second full spectrum of gamm energies seen.

Processing software is used to filter out cosmic radiation signatures, the ground vehicle signatures, the mean expected background signature of the Western Australian region, and to enhance the target peaks from the Cs-137 source.


TFA mentions the truck was passing by at 70km/h, which is surprisingly quick.


You'd think that was quick, ... but generally this kind of thing would be done from a crop duster airframe flying at an industry standard 70m/sec (252 km/hr).

I'm guessing the local Perth geophysical survey companies that routinely fly magnetics and radiometrics were all fully engaged flying pre booked contract work .. so they dragged in a couple of white transit vans and fitted them out to get the job done.


Switzerland uses Superpumas flying 90m over areas to measure radiation on the ground[1] . In around 3 hours they can measure 100 square kilometers.

[1] https://www.tagblatt.ch/ostschweiz/im-tiefflug-ueber-der-sta... (german)


Sounds like the sort of complex setup developed prior for other more exotic use cases...


Complex?

Seems straightforward enough in the geophysical instrumentation domain.

Exotic? Radiometric mapping has been around for 50+ years - Australia has mapped the entire country (size of mainland contiguous USofA) from aircraft with ~200m line spacing in that time (along with surveying other countries, Mali, Fiji, India|Pakistan border, elsewhere), Russia, South Africa, Finland, USofA also have radiometric survey teams.

It's handy for finding drums of radioactive waste in a Finnish forrest near the Russia border, for example, which was an actual contest | exercise some years ago.


Which military based in Australia do you think helped by supplying this?


Australian civilian radiation services with backing of AGSO (Australian Geological Survey Organisation) are easily able to handle this all within Australia w/out reaching out to the Indians, Pakistani's, Iranians, Russians, South Africans, or other international nuclear agencies.


Was this written by AI? Seems random.



Currently looking for a 4-day dev job in Munich :) http://laurentpichler.com/cv.pdf


Why on earth do you go by car for 4km?


Rain. Wind. Snow. Freezing temperatures. Hot & humid temperatures. Bad neighborhoods. Heavy briefcase.

All sorts of reasons.

Several years ago in Houston, we (there were several of us) drove across the street to have lunch most days. Over the course of a year, I never walked the route. Line of sight was maybe 500 yards, but a busy freeway was between the restaurant and our office. While you might think I'm crazy, I don't recall ever seeing any other business-dressed people walk under that freeway. you would be soaking wet from the heat & humidity by the time you got to lunch.


Y'all need pedestrian tunnels.


Funny enough, we have them downtown. They've flooded a few times due to the monstrous rains we get here (see hurricane harvey).

I think Minneapolis figured this out the best with a downtown connected by skybridges on the 2nd floor connecting tons (most?) of the buildings).


>Y'all need pedestrian tunnels.

Yeah, and? Most people also find pickup trucks excessive. And yet, they are the most profitable vehicles on the planet. So much so that Tesla wants to make one. There's a whole world outside the urban bubble, for better or worse.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: