Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | lemagedurage's commentslogin

Don't attach your pride to how well a product you work on is received. You can still take pride in improving a poorly received product, or even in just trying.

And another lesson: we define business success by how much money they make, not by how beneficial they are to society.

That didn't use to be the case. In the US many laws were approved in the 1930s that forced businesses to keep stakeholders in mind, not just shareholders. That led the US to become the global powerhouse it became, and its middle class to boom. Then in the late 1970s came deregulation, and those laws were all reversed, resulting in the new two-class system Americans are learning to hate, a new robber barons era very reminiscent of the previous one.

Too bad most everyone is lost in the artificially engineered "culture war" to notice they have a common enemy, one who benefits from the proles fighting each other rather than uniting against them.


Sounds like how governments are installed, by force

True. I feel like the main way a tool could differentiate from jq is having more intuitive syntax and many real world examples to show off the syntax.

The syntax makes perfect sense when you understand the semantics of the language.

Out of curiosity, have you read the jq manpage? The first 500 words explain more or less the entire language and how it works. Not the syntax or the functions, but what the language itself is/does. The rest follows fairly easily from that.


For better or worse, Claude is my intuitive interface to jq. I don't use it frequently, and before I would have to look up the commands every time, and slowly iterate it down to what I needed.

Steam runtime already gives developers a single target rather than having to support different distros individually.

If Steam Deck, the new Steam Machine etc take a significant part of market share, I think it will be more enticing for game developer to release a native version for Linux. Providing a native version should still be more robust and performant.


> still be more robust

Why? The only stable ABI on Linux is Win32.


Wow, that feels quite restrictive. "Classic for Git" would be allowed, but it doesn't quite have the same ring to it.


I have noticed this in GitHub issues too. Where many long paragraphs used to indicate high quality, now it's the opposite.


Yes, the more personal the context, the more the humanity aspect / being relatable matters.


To me the rhythm of the text makes it clear whether I'm reading something AI generated or not, usually.

Otherwise, not using em dashes, adding some mistakes and writing more like how you think/talk helps :)


Good on them. Platforms taking more than 10% feels unjustified and monopolish.


Did you ask it to make money?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: