Most people no longer read code, ai results or even watches full length videos anymore.

AI provides the same experience that you get when watching short videos.

You watch and you forget.

These models are being trained by just increasing quantity. Nobody cares anymore. It’s a race for AGI before money runs out.

That would only produce a model that you can ask questions to.

The close but not good enough is what gives us the illusion of productivity in this tools.

That’s why you see a a lot of hype around setups and benchmarks but not a lot of well polished products.

This article make it clear for 3d modeling, but also applies for code. Human touch is necessary for a commercial product. Otherwise it’s nothing more than a prototype.

It is actually much more difficult to maintain Ai code and 3d models than to just make your own.

Either AI can oneshot without human intervention or it becomes a pain really quickly

Precisely. Until the AI can 'one-shot' the topology and the UVs, it’s not a shortcut but rather a more power intensive way to generate technical debt.

No, it’s not. This is a real issue everywhere. The algos don’t discriminate anymore.

I loved the speed, but the cost is insane.

A cerebras subscription would be awesome!

This is 100% true. I've seen this happen over and over again.

Shaming does not work, you look like an idiot, people will start to despise you and then you end up ostracizing yourself from the rest of the community and the only ones left within your bubble, are circle jerk assholes.

It's one of those cases where you end up causing more harm than the ones you were complaining about.

Just pathetic behaviour.

I guess it depends if you are used to Rails.

Personally, I don't see the point in ever touching rails since bunjs gives me everything I need while being faster and typescript compatible.

Ruby does look pretty, but that's it.

Is there any benefit that would justify giving it a try if you already use typescript?

> especially when these LLM tools are going to get crazy expensive because at some point they will need to be sustainably funded

You say this with such certainty when progress is actually proving otherwise.

LLMS are only going to get cheaper.

There will always be expensive models, because they use the latest tech and infra, but that doesn't mean we need them for everything...

But year after year we see free or local LLMs become more powerful.

Dictators die all the time and most often not of old age. As we get older our flexibility to adapt to change also starts to diminish. You will eventually be outperformed. We can’t account for what we don’t know.

Perhaps, but the power conferred by the miracle of compound interest does not require performance.

I see a lot of people talking about the past, but I think this is just a reminder that no matter how successful they become, there will always be these periods where companies and people lose focus.

The exact reason/s for this to happen is hard to figure out. Leadership changes, trends, getting too comfortable, lack of competition, the list goes on...

There's always bad reactions to change, but eventually they fade away because the product turns out to be good and just needs some time to get used to it. But this time, this is not the case. Liquid glass sucks and so does the UX that came with it.

Apple will eventually fix this mess, they have all the resources in the world to do so.