Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ncannon's commentslogin

Walt Disney Animation Studios | Software Engineers | Burbank, CA | ONSITE | Full-time

Join the team designing the future of our filmmaking process for our animated feature films. Although many of our roles require advanced knowledge of computer graphics, that is not always the case. More roles will be opening up in the coming weeks so please keep checking back or create a profile to subscribe to new postings.

More information including how to apply at: https://www.disneyanimation.com/careers/open-positions


I have worn contacts 7 days a week for over 20 years, can't stand wearing glasses.

Modern daily disposable contact lenses are so easy, probably takes me total of no more than 25 seconds a day to deal with them and once they are in I have great vision and cannot feel them at all. I literally cannot tell whether I am wearing them other than the fact I can see properly.

Last time I did the math on LASIK the cost was equivalent to about 5 years worth of lenses. The convenience and flexibility of lenses outweighs the risks of LASIK for me.


Modern dailies are very expensive, if you wear them almost every days it's 1k+/year in lenses.


I wear modern dailies (1-Day Acuvue Moist) and it costs me under $500/yr, and that's not including the discounts I get from my insurance.

I couldn't believe the positive impact dailies have had on my life - I can't even tell I'm wearing contacts, my dry eye is all but gone, and allergy season is now bearable to me. Even if it was $1k/yr, paying $3/day for perfect eyesight with no discomfort or hassle is still an absolute no brainer.


I use 1-day Acuvue Trueye which are about $600/year after rebate and before any insurance coverage.

IIRC LASIK is around $1500-$2300 per eye depending on which generation of technology is used.


There is a new D2C company out there called Hubble. They don't offer custom base curve or correction for astigmatism, but I was able to get one year's worth for $265.


Every software company offers eye insurance.

Even without, it was 1k a year.


Mine have always been free after insurance.


Get the one Month sleeping ones. I switch out only once a month now.


I would personally recommend a trial for sleep-in contacts. I did so through my optometrist, firstly wearing them as dailies for a week. Then, after an optometrist inspection, leaving them in for one night, followed by another inspection. Finally, I was to sleep in them for a week (or perhaps five days, I forget) followed by another inspection. This final inspection showed that I had developed an eye ulcer during the final phase of the trial, which I had experienced as a very mild irritation. Luckily, there have been no longer lasting side effects.



Cool, I'm glad, but still always be careful.

Meanwhile, I don't really have access to a lawyer and I'm curious:

1. Should I trust a license which is not distributed with the source code (i.e. on the hopefully official website)?

2. Should I trust a license which is in a sub-directory? My initial assumption is that, only that sub-directory is licensed.


IANAL (but I work often with them) and, about (2)... It'd depend mostly on how it's presented. You could either argue along your reasoning (only sub-directories are licensed) or say "it's right there in the 'documents' subdirectory that comes with the project, it's in another directory only to have things better organized, so all the project is licensed".

Probably you'd be able to find legal precedents for both arguments. Still, I agree with you that it's good to pay attention and understand the licenses (or get legal councel if you don't) if you're planning on doing anythnig with these projects (and others too).


I don't think it changes yazaddaruvala's point. What happens when ptex website goes away and disney lawyers decide there was no proof?


Poor choice of link on my part, the license is there in the Github repo:

https://github.com/wdas/ptex/blob/master/src/doc/License.txt


Luckily there are tools like the Wayback Machine from archive.org where you can retrieve the previous versions. There's also some existing cases where it's been ruled to be a legitimate source of evidence too so you're not arguing that from scratch.


If you request removal from wayback machine (either robots.txt or direct) the history is gone too.


Copy the license into your fork of the codebase.


That's not how licenses work. You can't just apply what you assume is true. You'll get called out when you don't expect it.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: