Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | phatfish's commentslogin

It's fun watching the right wing try to square this circle. Especially in the UK where we import most of our fossil fuels.

We could have sovereign control over our energy supply with renewables and electrification. Yay, we become a great sovereign nation free to do whatever we want with our great British energy supply!

But no, the right wing answer is to develop a couple of gas fields in the north sea that would supply a tiny amount of actual energy requirements, and do nothing for prices as it all goes into a global trading platform.

I know the reason, it's hard to say no to all that money from the fossil industry, and walk back decades of indoctrinating your base at their behest. Even if it means making your country energy independent...


It's really sad comparing the UK with Norway. The latter did "drill baby drill" before it was cool, but almost exclusively for exports. Some of that money has been invested in rapid electrification - so that Norway can export even more!

Meanwhile, the left in the UK doesn't want to drill (so less money for electrification) while the right in the UK doesn't want to electrify (so less money due to more imports). Why doesn't anyone want to copy the Norwegian model?


> We could have sovereign control over our energy supply with renewables and electrification

No, you could not.


As long as they are the ones on the Sev 1 bridge when shit is down 6 months later I'm happy for them.

What can the Kremlin do that is worse than the tech bros? Leverage data to deliver people additive divisive content until it all boils over into the "real world" and splits society? Oh wait...

Or deciding where to send a drone attack to take out a political opponent

Some (well, two of them obviously) major world powers have forgotten that "winning" wars is a lot harder than starting them. Especially with drones and AI narrowing the technology gap.

OK bro.

Fair enough. But SBF chose to associate with "effective altruism".

Did Holmes create the "I'm an amazing FEMALE entrepreneur" persona? Or was she focused on the scam and the narrative was created around her?



I wish i could forget the last 6 years as well (to be clear, post COVID nonsense).


Maybe the depth of a game is related to whether it will scale. Go is played on different board sizes and still works.

If you make a Backgammon board bigger it would just be a slog and no real increase in tactical challenge.

Chess rules dictate a set size of board, which I guess has been refined over time.

If a Go board is made bigger or smaller it just adjusts the problem space, the rules and core of the game remain the same.


Perhaps interesting: Japanese chess, Shogi, is usually played on a 9x9 board, but there are many variants, which are played on bigger boards. Though games take longer and those variants are played rarely. It scales, but I think it's fair to state, that Go scales much better, due to its simplicity (simple != easy).


I thought it was Cmdr Data from Star Trek, but Sam's version is the certainly the one the c-suite think they want.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: