Then "on its own" has no meaning, i.e. everything an LLM does is "on its own".

For me, I use an IDE if I plan to look at the code.

So, to you basically the distinction is "fully vibe-coded" vs. "with human in the loop"?

It's sad I think we need complete control of "mainstream" internet because most people just scroll TikTok and believe whatever filter bubble they are in, and will vote thereafter.

The majority of people have intellectually regressed into sheep.

Should I understand what this is trying to show?

If we are just speculating here, I believe it can infer that you would not ask this question if the car was at home.

Lidar would pick up a moving object in 3D so unlikely to just keep going.

So satire can't have a large cultural impact? Very interesting theory without much support.

- https://www.amazon.com/Loserthink-Untrained-Brains-Ruining-A... - https://www.amazon.com/Reframe-Your-Brain-Interface-Happines... - https://www.youtube.com/@RealCoffeewithScottAdams

If that counts as "learning to think", you've got a really low bar.

I think "Scott Adams saved America" is what needs support, but feel free to put words in my mouth.

Having the best AI is prestigious for billionaires. It's that simple.

Then why did he go back to Google /s

I think it was quite big in Sweden.

Why on earth would the fallback when a prompt is under specified be to do something no human expects?