This is a moot argument. Of course s/he has to have a plan if s/he wants to be in business. What was asked was suggestions, not detailed strategy deliverables.

> Gerrit simplifies Git based project maintainership by permitting any authorized user to submit changes to the master Git repository, rather than requiring all approved changes to be merged in by hand by the project maintainer. This functionality enables a more centralized usage of Git.

https://code.google.com/p/gerrit/

I've found two things happening:

1) People are often more engaged in the actual review than in other groups I've been in which are doing online reviews. And here I'm talking more about a back and forth and not necessarily "everyone says their one thing". Because of this, I believe our group's thinking of stuff has evolved more rapidly than it otherwise would have. Which leads me to ...

2) It's been better for ramping new members up to speed as it's a great place for them to ask questions, not to mention listen in to the debates happening.

I hadn't done an old style code review like that for at least 10 years, but I have to say that I've enjoyed it.

    function parseJson(str) {
      try {
        return JSON.parse(str);
      } catch (err) {
        if (err instanceof SyntaxError) {
          return undefined;
        } else {
          throw err;
        }
      }
    }