simedw ~ $ claude -p "random number between 1 and 10"
7
simedw ~ $ claude -p "random number between 1 and 10"
7
simedw ~ $ claude -p "random number between 1 and 10"
7
simedw ~ $ claude -p "random number between 1 and 10"
7
Still having some issues that match my previous comment, I'll try to follow your blog and give more feedback as you work on it.
Will comment that the shorter phrases (2-4 characters long) were generally accurate at normal speed, but the longer sentences have issues.
Maybe focusing on the accuracy of the smaller phrases and then scaling that might be a good way to go, since those smaller phrases are returning better accuracy.
Again, really think this is a great initiative, want to see how it grows. :)
It’s fairly sensitive to background noise at the moment. I’m planning to train an improved version with stronger data augmentation, including background noise.
For accents, I’ve mostly tested with a few friends so far. I’m wondering whether region should be a parameter, because training on all dialects might make the system too lax.
I had a quick look at Farsi datasets, and there seem to be a few options. That said, written Farsi doesn’t include short vowels… so can you derive pronunciation from the text using rules?
First of all, big kudos for not missing a single day. When I used flashcards in the past, missing even a couple of days led to an avalanche of cards to review.
Since you’ve been so consistent and are using your own software, have you experimented with different resurfacing rates? Did you notice a material difference in recall?
I don't exactly think I have an algorithm better than FSRS yet, but I have an algorithm I like better. Hopefully I'll have more to say about this soon.
reply