Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | vostok's commentslogin

I find that increments of 1C are too small to be useful in daily life but increments of 5C are quite big. As a result, you can't really round degrees Celsius to a multiple of 5 whereas full precision integer temperatures are too precise. So for example 15C and 17C feel like different temperatures, but each 1C step from 15C to 16C to 17C is not really useful.

In contrast, it's very reasonable to round temperature to increments of 5 degrees Fahrenheit. So for example 58F and 60F are basically the same temperature as far as my perception is concerned.


It's literally does not matter in day to day life. In the end you get to X degrees is cold, Y degrees is perfect and Z degrees is hot regardless of C or F.

I grew up using C and now I'm using F, if I move to a country that uses C, I will switch again. Its meaningless.


This is the correct take. The better system is the one that you have intuition in - just keep using that one if building up intuition in a different system is not worth the cost to you. At least when it comes to temperature. :)

What are you talking about? The same can be said about 59F (15°C) and 60F (15.56°C)

"One fahrenheit increment doesn't feel like anything"

At least Celsius are grounded in reality, should I be worried about ice? Just check if temperature is below 0°C. But hey you may need to check if your solution of water, ice and ammonium chloride is frozen, so I just need to check if below 0F. That's probably something you do often right?


theyre both grounded in reality because the represent real temperature conditions.

theyre both just arbitrary degrees though, since 0 isnt actually 0. they both have better alternatives too - Kelvin and Rankin. your criticism about freezing applies to celsius too. freezing is at a certain pressure and temperature, so both the 100 and 0 celsius only sometimes describe boiling and freezing


I can sense 0.5C changes when I set my AC at home.

Do you know if running causes a person to have more or less heartbeats in a given time span? I'm not particularly medically knowledgeable and not sure.


During the run their heart rate will be higher, but afterwards their resting rate might be lower.


Right, that was the question.

Is there a net benefit?


There is a net benefit. Your heart gets stronger and spends less effort for pumping out the blood.

Your resting HR becomes lower and blood has more oxygen. And this happens 24/7. Assuming you’re running 5K 2 times in a week.


Outside of distance learning - I think computers are very rarely used for CS exams in my, albeit dated, experience.


I've generally had good experiences with the various compressed X11-like tools. One example is x2go, but there are a few.


oh man, I haven't thought about xpra in a while! Xpra was a layer of indirection between X clients and X server so you could ssh in, run eg firefox, disconnect, and then reconnect and pick up Firefox where you left it.


As someone who lives in a city, I'm not sure what I'd do with a car that is smaller than a tank. If it's a small car then it's probably for local trips and super inconvenient to park / re-park / etc. I want a big car to comfortably fit my family, our outdoor toys, and maybe even tow something.

Even if I lived outside a city, what do I gain by driving a smaller car? Going from 35 to 55 mpg? Parking is plentiful and equally convenient for big cars these days.


most people want all those things but reality they tow something maybe once a year, that's marketing working.


Pareto principle is strong when it comes to towing.


meanwhile the entire world from japan to the uk to brazil to south africa are fine to go grocery shopping and take their family out in their normal sized car. in the city.

cities are better with fewer cars and better public transit. and you dont need a tank. i didnt know your viewpoint even existed.


I think this person wants a space between Fizz and Buzz.


Exactly, which means the interviewer didn't even state the problem correctly. The train had already jumped the rails by the time the candidate started writing. Hopefully HR will agree that they deserve each other.


I really like the table of confusion as a way to look at this stuff. I find the terminology somewhat confusing and it's much easier for me to just look up the formulas.

That means 90% accuracy should mean (true_positive + true_negative)/(whole_population) == 90%.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confusion_matrix


So a trivial test that always says "No" will have better accuracy?

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/prostate-cancer/about/ke...

> About 1 in 8 men will get diagnosed with that cancer, through their whole lifetime.

So true_negative/whole_population>=87.5% at least (life time vs currently has cancer).

Or am I misunderstanding the meaning?


This is why accuracy is useless for reasoning about detection of rare things.


Assuming this is post-Obamacare, do you know why your insurance didn't cover it? I had this simplified model that insurance covers everything once you hit maximum out of pocket and I'd love to learn how that model breaks down in practice.


Your insurance has a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) that has a formulary (the list of drugs they cover). Multiple insurers might use the same PBM. New drugs aren't automatically covered, as they haven't necessarily made the calculation that the cost of it justifies using it versus the alternatives.

It's intentionally complicated in order to fracture responsibility, avoid paying out claims and extract payment from publicly funded insurers.


If the medication is on the formulary the max out of pocket is usually somewhere around $12K. It's not capped if it's not on the formulary. And fancy new drugs are often off the list.


My insurance company would have, but wanted me to try an older, cheaper drug first. Since the older drugs have a much more dangerous list of potential side effects, including lymphoma and skin cancer, and since the eli lily foundation would have covered it regardless, it was a no-brainer.

The co-pays on tier 3 (i.e. super spendy specialty drugs) are crazy anyway, so insurance covering it wouldn't have really changed the affordability aspect one way or the other.


The insurer is supposed to cover everything, as long as it is justified by the prevailing evidence and there is no alternative treatment.

However, you may have to fight for it.

https://www.healthcare.gov/appeal-insurance-company-decision...


My insurer wanted me to try a different, older biologic first. My dermatologist recommended going with Taltz instead because

- the eli lily foundation pays for it anyway

- the older biologics have far more serious side effects profiles

Given that, it was kindof a no-brainer. I would have needed to go through the foundation anyway, since the co-pays on these drugs are insane regardless.


You cam just ignore the Zone 2 advice as a relatively new runner. It's more useful when you're running high mileage.


Do you know what percentage of after tax income people paid fir this? I'm curious how other compares to today's services.


Paid for the service? I grew up in Scotland, milk and meat came from the farms every morning (90s), you'd put your order in the old milk bottle with the money and they'd leave whatever your order was. I seem to recall it was 50p for most type of milk and 75p for creams. (Except the BSE years.. shudder ugh the BSE years.)


[Edit] Do you think that the Aphex Twin song Milkman makes reference to this lack of milk delivery during this period?

Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), commonly known as mad cow disease, is an incurable and invariably fatal neurodegenerative disease of cattle. . . . Spread to humans is believed to result in variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (vCJD). As of 2018, a total of 231 cases of vCJD had been reported globally.

BSE is thought to be due to an infection by a misfolded protein, known as a prion. Cattle are believed to have been infected by being fed meat-and-bone meal (MBM) that contained either the remains of cattle who spontaneously developed the disease or scrapie-infected sheep products. The outbreak increased throughout the United Kingdom due to the practice of feeding meat-and-bone meal to young calves of dairy cows.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bovine_spongiform_encephalopat...


I just looked into it a bit. Timeline makes a lot of sense, Milkman was released in 1996, right during the height of the precautions (some farm kids couldn't come to school, needed to get sprayed down with some chemicals when we went into the high school, every shop/library/etc had a bucket of alcohol you walked through. However, it seems James was living in London during that period, and I don't think the restrictions in the cities were are harsh as the country. Interesting theory tho, I like it. :)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: