A judicial decision that states that "The interests of the Party-State take prio... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		dandelany on Jan 22, 2010 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: China slams U.S. "information hegemony" A judicial decision that states that "The interests of the Party-State take priority [over the Constitution]" seems legitimate to you? Are you being sarcastic?

adrih on Feb 5, 2010 [–]

No, I meant that the argument is legitimate in Chinese courts. It wouldn't be in Europe or in the US.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact