> The american law is not applicable in non US territories.
This is inaccurate in a number of ways. Certain American laws are, on their face, restricted in territorial applicability (others are explicitly not, others are neither explicitly limited nor explicitly unlimited and the application requires reference to principles beyond the individual law in question), and, particularly, certain protections of the Constitution have been held unenforceable against the government in the context of certain actions outside the territory of the United States.
But you can't correctly make a blanket statement that US law is not applicable outside of US territory.
US National laws are restricted to US Nationals, and the territory of the USA. Now, for laws that could apply outside of these boundaries, you are partially right, but these are covered by treaties, agreements, cooperation efforts, decrees and stuff like that between the USA and its friends.
> US National laws are restricted to US Nationals, and the territory of the USA.
No, they aren't (unless you are using "US National laws" as a label you've made up for laws that are restricted to US Nationals and the territory of the US.)
This is inaccurate in a number of ways. Certain American laws are, on their face, restricted in territorial applicability (others are explicitly not, others are neither explicitly limited nor explicitly unlimited and the application requires reference to principles beyond the individual law in question), and, particularly, certain protections of the Constitution have been held unenforceable against the government in the context of certain actions outside the territory of the United States.
But you can't correctly make a blanket statement that US law is not applicable outside of US territory.