Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It decided to go ahead with it's plans anyway in a different country. India doesn't need the FCC's approval. The fact that they are an American company doesn't matter. They did not violate any FCC regulations.


> The fact that they are an American company doesn't matter

You are wrong. American companies are subject to American law, domestically and overseas. Moreover, there are international rules governing satellite orbits and communications. These rely on countries overseeing their satellites. That entire regulatory regime was circumvented by Swarm taking advantage of the FCC’s light-tough regulatory approach (with respect to satellites) and the Indian government’a similar trust in Swarm having gotten its paperwork in order before shipping its bird for deployment.


> American companies are subject to American law, domestically and overseas

Absolutely not true. American companies don't pay foreign employees American minimum wage, for example.


US minimum wage laws are not written to apply globally, but if they were US companies would have to follow those laws.


They are subject to American minimum wage laws which (currently) don't require them to pay foreign employees a minimum wage. For a counterpoint, USA citizens are subject to USA income taxes even if they aren't in USA and possibly have never earned a single cent in USA ever.


> India doesn't need the FCC's approval

AFAIK, the FCC doesn't give launch approval, despite the fact that it's rules include space safety rules. OTOH, they do give permission to operate space-based commercial radio stations which are used in services operating in the US market.

India probably should apply reasonable space safety rules to avoid populating LEO with dangerous space junk, but FCC approval is orthogonal to that, and India breaking the rules isn't an issue.

> The fact that they are an American company doesn't matter. They did not violate any FCC regulations.

If they use the radios on those satellites for a service in the US, it will matter a lot. If they don't, it might not


"They did not violate any FCC regulations."

If they weren't incorporated in the United States and planning to operate in the US, then they might not need to satisfy the FCC. But....


They're an American company.

Further, their attitude is basically that of a spoiled child when told they can't do something.


Perhaps attempting to emulate Uber's dangerous pace of avoiding laws, yet getting enough funding to not care?


If they want to operate in America, they'll have to care about what the FCC says. And since they're an American company, skirting around the FCC's approval could mean this startup is about to shutdown.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: