Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yeah I really don't understand why Goldman should get a pass like this. They fucked up, they should lose money. Or better yet, errors like this should be reversed or safeguarded against better.


Honestly, this stuff just shows us how rigged the system is. This isn't the first time it has happened. Flash crashes caused by bad algorithms lost a bunch of money that was reversed as well. IMO, it is horrible to reverse this. They took the risk and got to keep the reward, but as soon as they fail, they get bailed out every single time.


If I were an exchange and would earn tons of cash from Goldman on trading commissions, I would bail them out too, I guess.


Why do this bring to mind how casinos treat big name gamblers...


> I really don't understand why Goldman should get a pass like this.

They didn't. They cancelled a lot of the trades before they were hit and a whole bunch were filtered out at the exchange end because they were way off market. They lost $38mm from what wasn't caught by either.

In other words, they fucked up and lost money. And it's generally agreed that safeguards needed to be better. That was a big part of Mifid II.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: