why not just http/quic? using 3 seems strongly suggest that it is the next gener... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

yy77 on Nov 25, 2018 | parent | context | favorite | on: Some notes about HTTP/3

why not just http/quic? using 3 seems strongly suggest that it is the next generation of http. They knew that but pretend it is not relavent.

dharmab on Nov 26, 2018 [–]

Because there's a decent chance that it will be the next generation of HTTP.

If it doesn't pan out they'll just move on. Remember IPv5?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact