Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It is a founding principle of western civilization that you cannot be prosecuted for thoughts and ideas. All viewpoints and thoughts are equal before the law; only actions can be prosecuted.

> We need to stop pretending like everyone's viewpoint is equal and we shouldn't exclude people for what they believe. Violent racists should be ostracized and pushed out of society. People who choose to have those kinds of beliefs are a constant threat to the safety of people around them.

I will hard disagree with this every day of the week. To me this is a clear example of how ideology has taken the place of religion in today's society. It's no longer enough for you to be civil and respect the laws, but even having the wrong thoughts is considered criminal, just like lust and envy are considered sinful in religion.

We're heading in a dark direction if we're re-adopting the same principles and perspectives that were behind McCarthyism, let alone used to burn witches and conduct the Inquisition.



So do you agree we were wrong to ban ISIS recruiting groups on facebook?

Less sarcastically, do you agree that the amplification of thought and rhetoric possible using social media isn't something that was considered 500 years ago? i.e. having wrong thoughts isn't dangerous, but having 75 million followers and pushing your wrong thoughts on them is dangerous. It isn't thoughts any longer - it's an action.


> All viewpoints and thoughts are equal before the law; only actions can be prosecuted.

And this would be an issue if we were actually talking about government action, but we are talking about private individuals deciding who they will associate with. When the government gets involved then you have reason for concern, but if this is private parties engaging in commerce you have absolutely no leg to stand on.


You're arguing against a straw man. No one is saying "ban them for their thoughts", they are saying "ban them for inciting violence".

(cue the desperate, too-cute-by-half arguments "but are they REALLY inciting violence?")


Yup.

It's a bad faith argument, yet it's everywhere. I'd think HN would be better than that, yet here we are, having the same fight every time free speech is the topic.

Also note that the parent mentioned "government action" whereas the GP is referring to a business taking action. The distinction is incredibly important, yet so many free-speech purists respond to corporate action as if it was a government action.


> It is a founding principle of western civilization that you cannot be prosecuted for thoughts and ideas.

Well then it's a good thing being kicked out of a bar isn't "prosecution".


>All viewpoints and thoughts are equal before the law; only actions can be prosecuted.

Speech is a kind of action, isn't it?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: