Actually that would be a direct threat of harm which I specifically mentioned se... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		trident5000 on Jan 12, 2021 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: How Silicon Valley destroyed Parler Actually that would be a direct threat of harm which I specifically mentioned several times. So no, I'm actually not saying that. I'm not sure how its even possible you arrived at that conclusion.

afuchs on Jan 12, 2021 [–]

How is it determined if something is a call to genocide or otherwise a call to commit harm?

From what I can tell, whether speech in the form of "group X should be eliminated" constitutes a threat is still subject to controversy [1].

[1] https://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2007/02/steyn...

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact