Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Nobody is proposing that though...

It's a fact that NCMEC referrals have identified teachers who were secretly pedophiles, who were subsequently banned from teaching. Most people see this as a good thing. If you want to do away with this, you have to bring a compelling argument.

I support everybody's right to argue for the type of society they want to see, but there's an arrogance/conspiratorial flavor to a lot of the comments here that suggest they don't really understand what they are up against. There are actual benefits.



> If you want to do away with this, you have to bring a compelling argument.

I'm a law-and-order guy myself, have applied for (technical) position in police and would even accept a paycut for it.

But it is with this like with other security related things, many people only considers two of the three cornerstones:

- confidentiality

- integrity

- availability

Same here:

Justice is not only about punishing every very bad guy.

It is also very much about not dragging innocent people through the worst accusations an innocent person can be dragged through.

Keeping people safe is not only about rescuing people from hostage situations - it is also about not ramming in the door at someone relaxing on their couch because some random guy or gal called over ip phone.

Too many people already go through huge problems because of false accusations. You say you work in the field so I guess you must have heard about cases were perfectly innocent people commit suicide because their lives got ruined because of what later turned out to be baseless accusations.

Justice is also about not creating a system that creates even more of this suffering, right?

(BTW: I really enjoyed the an0m trick and a few others. I root for you guys, but lets keep it real and not set up the worst footgun for the future since the well meant Jew lists in Europe early last century.)


I completely agree with your characterization of the various concerns.

I don't agree with the characterization that this system will cause baseless accusations.

These systems have been in place for many years and have proven themselves useful and reliable.

Apple have tried to implement it in a way that allows them to turn on E2EE on iCloud, and HN has turned that into a conspiracy theory.


I don't deny the system has some benefits, they just aren't benefits I will gladly give up my own freedom for nor the freedom of my fellow citizens.

I don't want to do away with anything; I just want "you" out of my devices, where "you" don't belong anyway and where you haven't been up to this point. (Well, you still aren't there because I don't use an iPhone, but hopefully the point is clear.)

Also note that I'm not against the use of such technology in certain situations, such as in unencrypted cloud storage. Though concerns with lack of oversight exist there as well! But installing this on end user devices goes a (huge) step too far.


Sorry, to clarify, you do in fact support Apple running the exact same scans on their server side CPUs? A situation that has the exact same effects on society...?

Your only concern then, is with a future authoritarian policy of your own imagination?


>A situation that has the exact same effects on society...?

Of all your (mis)leading questions, this one sticks out the most as being of particularly bad faith.


Can you explain why?

Commenters here are making claims about false positives, arrests of innocents, lived ruined etc. These effects are identical whether uploads are scanned before or after transmission.

What are the different effects of society from scanning the upload before transmission?


Yes, but

> A situation that has the exact same effects on society...?

This is patently false.

You do come off as arguing in bad faith, resorting to debasing any concerns of policy misuse as simply a product of the imagination of the person raising the concern. As if authoritarian policies and erosion of freedom/privacy are something completely baseless, impossible and unheard of, instead of happening all the time.


It's still not clear to me whether you are raising an issue with scanning client side, or your concern is actually with some other policy you expect to be implemented in future.

What is the most obviously different effect on society? I don't know how anyone would even know what CPU calculated their file hash.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: