Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The difference is typical digital cameras have a bayer filter in front of the sensor to allow taking a single color picture vs. here it sounds like multiple captures with individual filters (e.g. 1 blue, 1 red, 1 green, 1 monochrome) that are later combined into a color picture.


The point was at all color photos record electromagnetic radiation in visible colors.

The “it doesn’t take photos it record electromagnetic radiation” is a silly thing to say.


There's some subtlety here. Colors are percepts- phenomena that happen in the brain. Wavelengths and radiation describe natural electromagnetic phenomena, not percepts.

Example: Infrared has no "color". It's possible to induce the illusion of colors in the absence of light altogether. I appreciate that the article took care with this language, as it's a deep and fascinating topic.


This could be a comparative description of digital vs Chemical photography


"Chemical" photography captures electromagnetic radiation as well, but converts it into bonding energy, not into electrical signals.


Both are still capturing light.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: