> Generally, anything not-for-profit and older than 40 years is a technological shit-show.

Everything new is the same. Because everything has to be disruptive innovative hockey stick growth bullshit.

Here's a screenshot of tha app for a Swedish bank, Klarna: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FHXG5bPX0AIC1oe?format=jpg&name=.... They are a bank. They offer credit cards, and fast online credit payments.

And no, "Payments" isn't a list of your payments you've done throught them, that's behind two or three clicks now. It's what you owe them.

What the actual fuck. If you ever come to Australia the Commonwealth Bank and Australia Post apps are two examples to restore faith in humanity.

They are functional, practical, reasonably intuitive and they keep improving with actual valuable and handy features. Every now and then it still boggles my mind when I use them.

Whenever there is a request for reviews I make sure to mention it. I hope the dev team is paid well because they clearly deserve it.

To be fair, the other bank I use, Handelsbanken, is also sane: displays all the info you need, gives you quick access to functionality etc. Not without its issues, but Klarna takes the cake :))

I worked for a 80+ year old non-profit. Their tech was definitely a shit show before I turned it around. I won't be surprised if it ends up degrades into a shit show again in a decade or so.

Almost immediately after you left, they promptly lost the admin password, Phyllis in accounting said, "why don't we just go back to copy machines and filing cabinets, we know how those work" and they unplugged all your computers.

This may me hyperventilate, because I've been there - except in my case I hadn't left, I'd simply gone on holiday for 2 weeks.