Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Their field involved exactly zero need for economic analysis.

This is just dismissing the argument without addressing the assertion that the vast majority of cost in building nuclear is imposed by overly burdensome regulation.

> Naval reactor "engineering laboratory technicians" (SMAGs) are reputed among submariners as habitual liars.

From personal experience, ELTs were held to the exact same zero tolerance for lies standard I was. If you were caught by anyone lying you were out. Rank didn't even mater, nor did it matter if they were nukes or not. If you lied and it was caught, nuclear career over. I watched many people end their careers over how many push-ups they completed in a fitness test, covering for a buddy who was out with a girl when they shouldn't have been, lying about getting a tattoo, or even lying about what they ate for lunch. It was absolutely brutal.



I doesn't make up SMAGs' reputation: all I know is what retired "nukes" report. Ask them.


I was a nuke.


Ok, then you must know some others. Ask them. I'll wait.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: