It's badly written, but more on the level of a bad human writer than any AI. The connection between the three sentences in the first example seems quite clear to me. Starting from the second sentence:
1) "[...] some states start reversing the federal ban on this berry [because the ban has been deemed ineffective for disease prevention]".
2) "[Even though some US states are reversing the ban] Europe still remains the producer of 99% of the world’s black currants stock".
Regarding the second example, it is just an excuse to have an internal link to another article on the same site praising dried fruits. "It's not so bad [that Americans can only enjoy processed or dried blackcurrants] considering the benefits of eating dry fruits.". The reasoning is quite crappy, given that the linked article does not imply that dried fruits are better than non-dried fruits, but it is to the level of precision that one might expect from a filler blog on some health-food online store.
1) "[...] some states start reversing the federal ban on this berry [because the ban has been deemed ineffective for disease prevention]".
2) "[Even though some US states are reversing the ban] Europe still remains the producer of 99% of the world’s black currants stock".
Regarding the second example, it is just an excuse to have an internal link to another article on the same site praising dried fruits. "It's not so bad [that Americans can only enjoy processed or dried blackcurrants] considering the benefits of eating dry fruits.". The reasoning is quite crappy, given that the linked article does not imply that dried fruits are better than non-dried fruits, but it is to the level of precision that one might expect from a filler blog on some health-food online store.