Antitrust stuff isn't as simple as finding a monopoly. In fact, monopolies aren't intrinsically illegal in the first place.

If all the players present the same problem (in this case, giving in-house software an unfair advantage) then it might be cause for regulation.

This is a fair answer to something I didn't write.

I'm just making a "words have meanings" point. No hidden agenda about antitrust policies were intended.

At -4 points, I think this is my most downvoted post ever!

I think people use the term "monopoly" and "anti-competitive" somewhat interchangeably sometimes, even if the word is technically incorrect.

Technically the current smartphone stuff is a duopoly but there are definitely bits of anti-competitive behavior exhibited by the respective app stores.

I think it shows a distinct lack of imagination to think that Google and Apple can't compete in some areas of the market, while still being monopolies or engaging in monopolistic practices in others.

I dislike duopolies

/s