Search #1: Women, 24-28 within 30 miles of Chicago's main zip code.
EPIC FAIL.
Results: 18 profiles. 9 without photos. 9 with photos. None that I wanted to click on.
Search #2: Women ages 20-30 within 30 miles of Chicago's main zipcode.
SMALLER FAIL
Results: 45 profiles. 15 without photos. Five that I've clicked on to learn more about.
Of those five, one has no info and only a stock shot. That means it's either an early adopter guy testing it out or a Nigerian scammer in my book. Three aren't that interesting upon further look and the other one is gorgeous and seems interesting but is also about 4 years older than me. Not sure what I'll do on that front.
I don't see why we should let them off the hook for that. Match.com has an enormous userbase. Surely they could have spread the word somehow through various means to provide me with more than 18 search results throughout the entire city of Chicago.
Maybe that's what they did? This wasn't an official announcement. The POF guy obviously watches this space really closely, it's not too hard to believe he found out about it while they were still in seeding mode.
Search #1: Women, 24-28 within 30 miles of Chicago's main zip code.
EPIC FAIL.
Results: 18 profiles. 9 without photos. 9 with photos. None that I wanted to click on.
Search #2: Women ages 20-30 within 30 miles of Chicago's main zipcode.
SMALLER FAIL
Results: 45 profiles. 15 without photos. Five that I've clicked on to learn more about.
Of those five, one has no info and only a stock shot. That means it's either an early adopter guy testing it out or a Nigerian scammer in my book. Three aren't that interesting upon further look and the other one is gorgeous and seems interesting but is also about 4 years older than me. Not sure what I'll do on that front.
Not impressed.