Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> It seems like the author in fact did do this.

It doesn't seem like that to me. At one point in the article: "There are also a few issues [...] Let’s fix with the prompt" and then a prompt that is referring the previous message. Almost all prompts after that seem to depend on the context before them.

My point is that instead of doing that, revise the original initially message so the very first response from the LLM doesn't contain any errors, because (in my experience) that's way easier and faster than trying to correct errors by adding more messages, since they all (even O1 Pro) seem to lose track of what's important in the conversation really fast.



I'm just saying I don't think they repeated that whole process for Claud.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: