Obtuse maybe, but I'm not missing the point. Their point is nonsensical, given that LLM generated code isn't "as good as fast food compared to home made meals" or even comparable to "food".

Go ahead and explain why I'm missing the point.

The point is, for most projects there is nothing wrong with writing McDonald's level code. It's not as healthy or tasty as a homemade meal, but it will perform its main function (i.e. prevent you from starving).

Eh, if that was the point then please, go ahead and show me this magical AI system that produce "edible" level of code then.

All I seen so far is badly generated boilerplate and enough template spaghetti to confuse some CS dropouts by the looks of it.

still a good advice