I thought it was a different kind of nonsense, but it still has a subtle error. Goes to show even more how risky it is to repeat LLM answers as factual.
Could you point out what you mean? It's really hard to follow you. You say it's nonsense but it is not clear why. Then I write down a response that took me quite a while to format correctly (and to look up) and you then say "I thought it was a different kind of nonsense." Then you say it still has a subtle error.
It is really hard to follow you if you don't explain yourself.
I'm not saying it's factual. The reason I showed that answer was simply to verify to see if it was what you thought it was (hence I asked "is it?"). It turns out that it wasn't fully.
