Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not disputing anything, but would it have killed arstechnica to include some primary source links to back up their assertions?
 help



A direct link would be better, but they mentioned it at the beginning: "On Tuesday, the US Energy Information Administration released full-year data on how the country generated electricity in 2025."

This is the report: https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/current_month/februa...

It has full-year data for 2025 in table ES1.B.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: