Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

[flagged]


Over and over and over and over again it has been shown that there is no meaningful voter fraud whatsoever. Stop watching Fox News or as I see below reading yahoo news lol


[flagged]


Amen my white brother. When is senior hour at the buffet? You know how we get in our age


White, black, yellow, red, or brown. 10 or 90. The truth remains.


Do you hear yourself?


>Do you hear yourself?

Do you?


You realize you're the one repeating demonstrably false statements?


>You realize you're the one repeating demonstrably false statements?

That you believe a lie doesn't make what I have to say a lie.


> Saying a thing over and over doesn't make it true.

Even saying it once doesn't make it true. Apply that to everything you have said.


[flagged]


Why are you lying about what the other person said? They said "no meaningful fraud" as in there's not an amount of fraud that can actually change the results.


>Why are you lying about what the other person said?

Why do you see the truth as a lie?

>They said "no meaningful fraud" as in there's not an amount of fraud that can actually change the results.

Except there is plenty of evidence across the world for over twenty years of "meaningful fraud that could change election results" happening. Heck, it actually goes all the way back to the Civil War and while history records Lincoln being elected, the cheating was such his election almost wasn't.


>Why do you see the truth as a lie?

I don't. Read what I said again. You were lying about what the other person said, i.e. attacking a strawman.

>Except there is plenty of evidence across the world for over twenty years of "meaningful fraud that could change election results" happening.

No there isn't, not in the US. Substantiate your claim.


Your vague handwavey manner of writing sounds very presidential.


It's actually very specific. Look up the previous abuses of the US Postal Inspections Bureau and you will see exactly what I mean and why I've said it the way I've said it.


“It’s very specific”

“Just look up vague abuses that I’m claiming happened with no evidence”


>https://www.yahoo.com/news/the-postal-service-is-running-a-r...

Here is one instance among many.


What does that have to do with anything discussed here?

Wait'll you hear about the Comstock Act and what the USPS has done to enforce that.


"Specific" would involve some sort of detail about what these abuses were, or when they happened, or something beyond just "previous abuses of the US Postal Inspections Bureau."


[flagged]


How does the article you linked support your point that mail-in voting is abused or rife with fraud?


>How does the article you linked support your point that mail-in voting is abused or rife with fraud?

The absence of outrage on one issue concerning the Postal Service, and the presence of it for another. How come you couldn't understand that point?


> How come you couldn't understand that point?

Because you're vague-posting continually.

> The absence of outrage on one issue concerning the Postal Service, and the presence of it for another.

I don't see how the "absence of outrage" over a completely separate issue in any way proves your point about mail-in voting being abused.


The fun thing about being extremely vague is that it's inherently unsearchable. I can do a search and find reports of USPIS abuses, but I have no idea if they're the ones you're referring to or not, because you didn't say what you were referring to. And I'm not about to spend a bunch of time trying to work out which ones you meant and how they might connect to voting by mail when you can't be bothered to give even the slightest bit of information.


[flagged]


All right Mike Lindell calm down




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: