Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You're not even speaking coherently. They aren't sabotaging it by not adopting it. That's just called... not adopting some arbitrary spec.

Being published by the IETF doesn't mean anything. The IETF has a spec for SIMPLE, too. Should we blame all XMPP networks for sabotaging that "standard"?

Why should a third party have to do something just because you don't like how they run their own networks?



> They aren't sabotaging it by not adopting it.

Oh, really? Inaction can be damaging as well. In this case - it's sabotage. Since you bring SIMPLE, which of these major closed networks support it?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: