How did such a horribly written article with no substance or structure got so popular? This guy just explains how he "thinks" and "feels" with no supporting evidence.
One of his first points is:
"I feel that Angular’s fundamental proposition blurs the line between front end and back end."
Why? I feel it makes the line clearer. So there.
After I read the entire article I was still left wondering what his point was. He concludes with discussing Angular 2.0
"The 2.0 rewrite is aimed at front-end developers, but may not reach them, and in addition will turn off Angular’s current following. I don’t think Angular will survive the rewrite."
Well, no shit. Let me get this straight: a front end framework isn't going to survive because it's targeted at front end developers? Who writes this crap?
One of his first points is: "I feel that Angular’s fundamental proposition blurs the line between front end and back end."
Why? I feel it makes the line clearer. So there.
After I read the entire article I was still left wondering what his point was. He concludes with discussing Angular 2.0
"The 2.0 rewrite is aimed at front-end developers, but may not reach them, and in addition will turn off Angular’s current following. I don’t think Angular will survive the rewrite."
Well, no shit. Let me get this straight: a front end framework isn't going to survive because it's targeted at front end developers? Who writes this crap?