Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yes.

Their IP Failover is really badly documented and hard to work with.

Their Nodebalancers are noticeably slow, the interface is alright, but you are better off setting up your own loadbalancer.

I feel that static networking could be made easier, and more automatic when I am adding a new node.

Their stackscripts should be able to receive parameters for when it is running, and the error-reporting should be better. I had issues where my scripts wouldn't run and I had no idea why.

Other than that, I am a happy customer.



I agree that networking is a pain point in terms of front-end interface. It's not horrid, but it could be improved.

I'd love to see them offer a storage solution as other commenters have mentioned.



Oh that was hidden away, I have never seen that interface before, thanks!


When was the last time you added a node? New nodes default to 'automatic' networking now which configures /etc/network/interfaces automatically


I scale up and down weekly. I didn't know about that, I will look into it, do I just need to add static networking to the node?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: