Hence the point of my second comment - not incorrect per se, but not really any evidence suggesting that it is correct, on a number of different fronts.
The point of the first part of my comment was to answer the question posed.
What? The person directly asked how this research might be used by people on the "far right," I was merely responding.
This is lazy reasoning - you're imputing on me arguments that I didn't make and even if I had made them, they wouldn't impact the veracity of the other claim I was making.
The point of the first part of my comment was to answer the question posed.